Today's Verse


Blog Roll

Archives
Categories

Recent Entries

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Rehashing Hash

I promised one of our regular readers, TJ, that I would address his comments in a post. I still plan on doing so. He challenged statements on the following:

  • Liberals want Iran to have Nukes


  • Border Security


  • Republican Social Security Plans


  • Impact of repealing the Death (or Estate) Tax


  • Increasing military pay (couched in the idea that Bush "cut veterans benefits")
I am not avoiding these issues; I've been working on the post today, but it will not be completed today. I promised TJ it would and I apologize.

More to come...
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 06:51 PM in Blogging
(1) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Foreign Statements on Katrina

Americans know that when crisis strikes in the world, we will do our best to assist. The fundamental basis of charity is to do so without expecting anything in return. We jokingly ask, "when will the world send us aid?" "When will Kofi get in front of the camera?" I appreciate the sentiment in criticizing the UN because of the arrogant assumptions they made during the Boxer Day Tsunami crisis. The UN scolded the United States and demanded charity.

But take a moment to see what nations are saying:

The fierce storm has left in its wake a still unknown death toll. In Mississippi alone it is estimated 125 people lost their lives in what French President Jacques Chirac called "terrible days" for Americans.

"In these painful circumstances, I wish to express the solidarity of the French people and my sincerest condolences for the tragic disappearance of so many of your compatriots," Chirac said in a letter to his US counterpart, George W. Bush, whom he addressed as "dear George".

Britain's Queen Elizabeth II voiced sorrow in a message to Bush.

"I was deeply shocked and saddened to learn of the deaths and injuries caused by Hurricane Katrina, and the scale of the damage and destruction now becoming apparent across the southern states," said the message made public by Buckingham Palace.

"My sympathy goes to you and the people of the United States, especially to the families of those who have lost their lives, to the injured and to all who have been affected by this terrible disaster."

An offer of support for the US rescue operation came from Russia's emergency situations ministry, which said it had two transport planes at the ready, together with rescuers, search helicopters and equipment for autonomous operations in a disaster zone.

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah also assured Bush in a telephone conversation of the "support of the kingdom to its friend the United States during its misfortune."

King Abdullah said the kingdom, the world's top oil exporter, was prepared to "do everything that it can to help towards lessening the consequences of the hurricane."

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi sent a brief message of condolence and support to Bush.

"Dear George, I am with you and the American people in this moment of distress," read the message released by Berlusconi's office.

Sympathy also came from the head of the Greek Orthodox Church in a message to Bush as well as from Greece's prime minister.

"Our thoughts go out to the relatives of the victims and to all those who are suffering the consequences of this catastrophe," said the Greek leader, Costas Karamanlis.

As rescuers search for survivors and officials begin to assess the massive property damage from the fierce hurricane, the Chinese government hailed the resilience of the American people.

"The American people will overcome the aftermath of the disaster and rebuild their homeland," Chinese President Hu Jintao said in a message.

Hu is set to hold talks with Bush in Washington next Wednesday on his first visit to the US as China's head of state.

The OPEC oil cartel also sent a message of condolence to the US government and people, vowing to do its utmost to ensure the stability of the global oil market in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

"Our deepest sympathy goes out to the families and friends of all those who lost their lives or who have been injured in this natural catastrophe of unimaginable dimensions," the organisation said.


Thank you for your concern and pledges of aid.
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 06:22 PM in Weather
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Concert for Katrina Victims

Good news:

The NBC Universal Television Group, which has been active in raising money during previous national disasters, has scheduled a live benefit special, A Concert For Hurricane Relief, in high-definition on NBC, MSNBC and CNBC at 8 p.m. Friday.

The hour music- and celebrity-driven broadcast will air live on the East Coast, tape delayed on the West.


The telethon, hosted by NBC's Matt Lauer, will be broadcast entirely from 30 Rock.

The special will feature performances by artists with ties to the affected areas, including Tim McGraw, Harry Connick, Jr., and Wynton Marsalis, ...


Bad news:

and feature an appearance by Leonardo DiCaprio, among others.

What's the over-under on him bringing up global warming? I have an idea--let's call global warming what it really is: weather.
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 03:43 PM in Weather
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Walks, Talks and Quacks:  WMD Found in Iraq

Thanks, Dangerus:

U.S. transferred uranium from Iraq without U.N. authorization

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States didn't have authorization from the U.N. nuclear watchdog when it secretly shipped from Iraq uranium and highly radioactive material that could be used in so-called "dirty bombs," U.N. officials said Wednesday.

The nearly 2 tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1,000 highly radioactive items transferred from Iraq to the United States last month had been placed under seal by the International Atomic Energy Agency at the sprawling Tuwaitha nuclear complex, 12 miles south of Baghdad, the officials said.

"The American authorities just informed us of their intention to remove the materials, but they never sought authorization from us," said Gustavo Zlauvinen, head of the IAEA's New York office.

U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham disclosed the secret airlift from Iraq on Tuesday as "a major achievement" in an attempt to "keep potentially dangerous nuclear material out of the hands of terrorists." The material was taken to an undisclosed U.S. Energy Department laboratory for further analysis.

The airlift ended on June 23, five days before the United States transferred sovereignty to Iraq's new interim government.


A roundup:


  • 500 tons of yellow cake uranium stored at Saddam's al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons development facility, which was secured by U.S. troops after the invasion.


  • 1.8 tons of partially enriched uranium discovered at al Tuwaitha, which was removed by the U.S. Energy Department in June 2004 amidst warnings it could be used to produce a dirty bomb.


  • Centrifuge parts and blueprints hidden by one of Saddam's top nuclear scientists, who told U.S. interrogators that he was ordered to keep the bombmaking tools ready to resume production at a moment's notice.


  • Satellite photos from 2002 that showed new construction at al Tuwaitha, which had been largely destroyed in U.S. bombing raids during the first Gulf War and Operation Desert Fox.


  • The discovery of nearly two dozen artillery shells loaded with Sarin and mustard gas, which was reported in June 2004 by Iraq Survey Group chief Charles Duelfer.
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 12:38 PM in Iraq
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Right Wing News All Wrong

We love John Hawkins. But I take exception (extreme exception) to his post on looting. He believes that there is no moral justification for looting--even if it were for food.

So I have a family and we haven't eaten in three days. What am I supposed to do? John is guilty of what we often criticize the left of doing: complain but offer no solutions. What are the 100,000 plus people who have no food supposed to do? And what about the children? It's not their fault their parents didn't heed the evacuation orders. So they should starve as well?

I'll go a step further and say that not only is looting food morally acceptable, but also medical supplies and medicine. I think it's perfectly acceptable for a person to walk into a CVS and get bandages, peroxide, even bug spray, and even break into the pharmacy to get needed medicine.

This looting business--and the images of it on TV--shames myself and should shame the rest of the black community. But only the looting of merchandise--not food.
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 12:02 PM in Weather
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Racism in the MSM

I, of course, am not surprised.

Is this just me playing a race card? Or can my fellow conservatives begin to see that not all is right with race in this country and that it's not trumped up grievance-mongering in many cases.

From Wonkette (of all places):






So. White people "find" food. Black people "loot" food.

This would be different if one had food and the other was carrying a flat-panel HDTV.
Posted by Aaron on 08/31 at 11:22 AM in Race
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Where in the World is Kofi Annan?

Wherever he is, he isn't where Katrina hit.

Click here to see today's UN news. Nowhere does it mention anything about the aftermath of Katrina. No UN-sponsored relief efforts, no Kofi dashing down for a photo op. However, you might be pleased to know that Kofi is cutting his vacation short in order to prepare for a summit in September...the next in a very long line of summits. And of course, there is no criticism being aimed at him over his conspicuous absence.

Some might argue that America, as one of the wealthiest countries in the world, doesn't need UN or other foreign aid. Perhaps. But even the very small comfort of Kofi's "moral support" in a time of great crisis in our deep South might go a long way toward healing the ever-widening rift between the US and the UN.

No, we don't need the money. Donations from generous Americans and money from various funds will cover the losses. But is it that hard to make a statement? Call a press conference? We know how much bureaucrats love press conferences...

I guess we'll have to muddle along without Kofi.
Posted by Pam on 08/31 at 10:22 AM in United Nations
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Dowd on A Woman President

I shudder when I see the ads for this ridiculous show, Commander-In-Chief, on Monday Night Football. You just know she's going to weigh everything carefully and then come down on the side of the liberals, right?

La Dowd decides to spend some ink as a TV critic here, and why not? After all, the Times' theatre critic spends his time opining on politics, why not let Slow-Mo cover the boob tube?

Nobody wants the vice president, a political independent, to be Madame President. Not the president, who tells her before he dies to resign so his ally, the archconservative speaker of the House played by Donald Sutherland, can get the job. Not the president's chief of staff. Not her sulky, sexy conservative teenage daughter. Even her supportive (and faithful) politico husband gets skittish after East Wing staffers begin calling him "the first lady" and arrange his meetings with the White House chef.

Did you ever notice how the biggest liberals in Hollywood end up playing "conservatives" (or people who displayed "conservative traits"? Carroll O'Connor played Archie Bunker, Ted Danson played Becker, Michael Douglas was Gordon Gecko, and now Donald Sutherland straps on his conservative suit. It's obvious that he's going to be played as the villain here--"archconservative" couldn't mean anything else.

The creator and writer, Rod Lurie, also had an embattled woman vice president in his 2000 movie "The Contender." (He named his TV president and vice president Bridges and Allen; the stars playing those roles in 2000 were Jeff Bridges and Joan Allen.)

Oh lord. The Contender was one of the most unintentionally funny movies I've ever seen; the whole second half is a larf riot if you aren't taking the picture seriously. Why do I get the feeling that the C-in-C will not be religious at all?

Dowd slides seamlessly into the real world. Well, actually it's with a jarring thud:

As Geena Davis was bursting into the Oval Office, and the other TV president, Martin Sheen, was dropping in on Cindy Sheehan in Crawford, Hillary was plotting for real.

Her political activism began with her 1969 Wellesley commencement speech, when she slapped back a Republican senator, Edward Brooke, for criticizing the students' Vietnam War protests. She praised "that indispensable task of criticizing."


You can almost sense that MoDo is all set to render some opinion on Hillary with her devastating wit, can't you? Neither can I.

But by hanging back and trimming her positions, by keeping her powder dry until a more politically advantageous time, she may miss the moment when Americans are looking for someone to emerge from her cowering party to articulate their anger about Iraq or their fear about a Supreme Court that will scale back women's rights and civil rights here, as Islamic courts do the same in Iraq.

Hillary may get caught flat-footed. Or she may be right in betting that there's no need to do anything rash now, like leading.


She may be right, she may be wrong. How much do they pay Maureen to come up with pearls of wisdom like this?

Of course Hillary's doing the smart thing by not kowtowing to the idiot "cut and run" crowd; that's really a small (but vocal and activist) part of the Democrats. Howard Dean, for Pete's sake, doesn't want to pull out immediately. It's just the idiots like Dowd.
Posted by Brainster on 08/31 at 01:06 AM in Op-Ed/Commentary
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Mark Alexander on Cindy Sheehan: Responsibility

After reading Aaron's post (a few posts below this one) regarding Cindy Sheehan and his view that had she lived during WWII she might have been tried for treason, I came across this article by Mark Alexander on Town Hall. This paragraph jumped out at me (emphasis mine):

Cindy Sheehan, of course, has every right to free speech, but Ms. Sheehan is also responsible for the exercise of that right. Her crusade is not about "grief," as her Angry Left cronies claim; it is about the arrogance and selfishness that uniformly characterize the Left's causes. Her fallen son deserves the gratitude of all Americans, yet Ms. Sheehan's actions merely minimize his noble sacrifice.

I believe this is what Aaron was trying to get across.

Alexander also makes this observation:


Objectivity, however, has never been the guiding principle of Leftmedia "journalists." To wit, no headlines have featured or news leads have featured comments from the parents of Army Cpl. Forest Jostes, 22, who served with Casey Sheehan in the 1st Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Cavalry. On 4 April 2004, Forest died beside Casey in the same battle with Jihadis.

Last week, Forest's parents, Von and Diane Ibbotson, had this to say about his death: "We were at a crossroads, but we decided from the day he died that we were going to honor him, his sacrifice. We support the President, and we have made a conscious effort to not make this political."

Of Ms. Sheehan's behavior, Forest's parents said, "We both lost sons in the same battle, but the similarities pretty much end there. Cindy Sheehan has a right to protest, wave signs, march or whatever, a right she wouldn't have had it not been for men like our sons. My son gave his life for the freedom we enjoy in this country; I hope that the Iraqi people have that someday. We feel sympathy for Mrs. Sheehan, but we're angry because she presumes to speak for so many. I resent the fact that she says she 'speaks for the millions' and is the face of the Gold Star families. That is not so."


So indeed, let them wave their signs and have their protests. Just don't tell everyone else they aren't allowed to disagree.
Posted by Pam on 08/30 at 09:11 PM in Iraq
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Americans Are Better People than Arabs

Americans are far superior to Arabs and others in the Middle East.

One million lives of "those people" are not worth the glory of Democrats in power in America.

F*ck the Iraqis. The Democratic party needs a platform--a statement--that will rally the emotionalism of America.

Whatever happens after we cut and run because of this "senseless war" that stopped the genocide in Iraq is not worth the price of one more dollar spent on "those people."

So says the Arab-American (and national joke) Helen Thomas:

It's time for the Democratic Party to take a courageous stand and call for the withdrawal of troops from the senseless war in Iraq.

Its human cost and the billion-dollars-a-week tab in Iraq should give all Americans pause.

Would the Republicans have hesitated to challenge the Democrats if the shoe were on the other foot? Did the opposition party give President Clinton any slack while he was in office?

What is the logic of Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., Joseph Biden, D-Del., and other so-called moderate Democrats still backing the unprovoked war in Iraq when they know they were sold a bill of goods?

Furthermore, they are urging that more troops be sent to Iraq. And they are doing so at a time when the generals in Iraq are giving mixed signals. Some are talking about a draw-down of troops in a year, others in four years.

Are the Democratic leaders afraid to admit they were wrong? Does the credibility of the administration -- and, therefore, the country-- mean anything to them?

Both Clinton and Biden are presumed presidential contenders in 2008. That leaves Democratic voters -- many of whom are anti-war -- with no choice if either wins the party nomination.

Can Biden and Clinton give young men and women any valid reason why they should lay down their lives in a war that we didn't have to fight in the first place?

The fallback position apparently runs like this: "We're there and we have to stay there now. We can't cut and run."

I heard the same refrain during the dying days of the Vietnam War. And so did the moderate Democrats.

Whether viewed as a "mistake" or a "noble cause," the fact is that Vietnam survived and thrived after we departed. It is a participant in the global economy and fairly friendly to us.

I always thought the debacle in Vietnam and its aftermath had taught us a lesson. But apparently not.

Not all Democrats are so clueless. In an opinion article on Wednesday in The Washington Post, former Sen. Gary Hart, D-Col., wrote that "history will deal with George W. Bush and the neoconservatives who misled a mighty nation into a flawed war that is draining the finest military in the world ... diverting Guard and Reserve forces that should be on the front line of homeland defense, shredding international alliances that prevailed in two world wars and the Cold War ... and weakening America's national security."

But he is also tough on his own party and asks: "What will history say about an opposition party that stands silent while all this goes on?"


Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., is proposing a total pullout of U.S. troops by Dec. 31, 2006. Why wait a year?

Some Democrats think the party should simply take a back seat, bide its time and watch the administration defensively struggle for answers to Cindy Sheehan, the California mother who lost her son, Casey, in Iraq. Her vigil continues adjacent the president's Texas ranch.

Bush told the Veterans of Foreign War the United States will accept nothing less than "total victory over the terrorists and their hateful ideology."

His new argument is that anti-war protesters who want the troops brought home quickly "are advocating a policy that would weaken the United States."

Bush himself acknowledged there were no ties between the deposed dictator Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 commission concluded that there was no evidence of "a collaborative operational relationship" between Saddam and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network.

The U.S. invasion of Iraq has changed that equation. The Iraqi resistance is being helped by outsiders -- whether terrorists or sympathizers -- who were not in Iraq before we attacked.

Did Bush think that at least some Iraqis would not stand and defend their country? Is patriotism simply a U.S. phenomenon?

White House reporters have noted that in addressing military families, Bush is citing statistics on Americans killed in Iraq -- a figure now approaching the 2,000 mark. But the candid test will be when he notes the numbers of Iraqis who have been killed since the United States invaded their country.

Democrats have gone about their lives after giving the president a blank check to do anything he thought was necessary. They think they have absolved themselves of responsibility. It's somebody else's war.

But they might find that if they don't get some backbone and take a stand soon, the voters might not be that forgiving.

Posted by Aaron on 08/30 at 08:18 PM in Leftwing Lunacy
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Cindy Sheehan’s True Colors

I am printing this statement in full. Many complained that she is simply a grieving mother and that it is horrible to even criticize her statements and ideas since she is simply grieving and saying things she might not mean.

After reading this statement, I can say with confidence that Cindy Sheehan is a horrible, nasty and disgusting human being. She, like so many others, become ticks on the backs of heros and claim virtue by proxy. Note that the people that came out (many who were mother's of slain soldiers) and exercised the same right Cindy has--these mothers are brainwashed and support murder and mayhem.

If this were the 1940's and I was a democrat, I would have her tried for treason:

I finally figured out George Bush's NEW reason for staying in Iraq. This reason has also been co-opted by the Move America Forward (forward to what: Fascism?) and the poor mothers who would be honored if their sons were killed in George Bush's war for greed and power.

Since the Freedom and Democracy thing is not going so well and the Iraqi parliament is having such a hard time writing their constitution. Since violence is mounting against Iraqis and Americans and since his poll numbers are going down everyday, he had to come up with something.

I have continually asked George Bush to quit using Casey's name the name of the other Gold Star Families for Peace loved ones to justify his continued killing. He continues to say this: 'We have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission.' So the mission is now this: WE MUST CONTINUE KILLING AMERICANS BECAUSE AMERICANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN KILLED!!!

How can anyone, anyone in their right minds support this line of reasoning' I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support this man and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves. Iraq DID NOT have WMD's; Iraq WAS NOT linked to Al Qaeda and 9/11; Iraq WAS NOT a threat or danger to America. How can these moms who still support George Bush and his insane war in Iraq want more innocent blood shed just because their sons or daughters have been killed' I don't understand it. I don't understand how any mother could want another mother to feel the pain we feel. I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America, but they know the pain and heartache and they should not wish it on another. However, I still feel their pain so acutely and pray for these 'continue the murder and mayhem' moms to see the light.

I didn't do my blog last night because I was so exhausted. I am now lying awake at night thinking and worrying about a couple of things. First of all, how can we keep the momentum of Camp Casey going' Our first step is a bus tour consisting of three buses going through 3 different parts of the country, stopping at various places to do rallies and 'visit' Congress people's offices. I had a brainstorm during my press conference yesterday'our first stop will be at Mr.Tom Delay's office. I just opened my mouth and the words came out and the Bus Tour organizers re-worked the bus schedule so we could make that happen. But before we even issued the invitation to Tom Delay, his office had released a statement saying that he was 'too busy to meet with me.'

In taking Camp Casey to Congress we are creating problems for the very people who voted to give George the authority to invade an innocent country and cause the deaths of so many people. We will eventually target every Congress person, pro-peace or anti-peace alike, Republican or Democrat, and ask them the same questions we are asking the president. Except with Congress, we are going to add one more thing: 'Since there is no Noble Cause, you need to develop a speedy exit strategy and bring our troops home as soon as humanly possible.' Check out BringThemHomeNowTour.org for more info on our bus tour and how you can be involved.

The second thing that worries the crap out of me is the almost icon status that I have achieved. I never set out to become the 'Rosa Parks of the Peace Movement.' I ventured out on August 6, 2005 to hold George Bush accountable and to raise awareness about his lies and misuse and abuse of power. I didn't set out to become anyone's hero. I am a regular mom who just wants peace and no one else to be murdered for the deceptions of our government. I love the love and support of America: it is what sustains me through these very difficult times and the reich-wing smear campaign. I am blown away and humbled that people are coming from all over the world to meet me and have their pictures taken of me. I am honored when people ask me for my autograph and I love meeting the little ones. I think we really need to focus our energies on the cause of peace, though'and the message, not the messenger. I am not a perfect person. I am strong and I do have the cajones to tell the world that our 'emperor' has no clothes, but it is done out of love of Casey and the others who have died and who are in harm's way and out of the simple fact that at the end of the day I have to look at myself in the mirror. If I didn't do everything in my power to end this monstrosity of an occupation in Iraq, how could I do that? I promised my boy that I would make the world a better place for his unborn nieces and nephews, and I mean to keep that promise.

We are going to have an eventful day at Camp Casey. We are holding a big rally and so are the 'pro-continue the killing because Americans have died already' people. I am a little apprehensive about this. We know that the Sheriff's know that the other people are coming to stir up trouble and provoke us into violence. Well, that is not going to happen on the Camp Casey side. We will not resort to the same tactics as their leaders.

Camp Casey is a place of peace and love and we won't let ignorant citizens bring us down. At this point the smears are amusing me, rather than hurting me.

I will keep you all posted about today's events. Please pray for us that everyone keeps a cool head.

Peace!!!!


Yes, I said TREASON. Freedom of speech is not the right to say and do anything. She is actively promoting defeat of our soldiers and, although she claims otherwise, desires a higher body count to tout on her hate America tour.
Posted by Aaron on 08/30 at 07:34 PM in Leftwing Lunacy
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Hurricane Trivia

A Category 5 hurricane hit the United States during the terms of all these presidents but one. Which president's term in office did not see such a storm?

  • Franklin Roosevelt


  • Richard Nixon


  • Bill Clinton


  • George H.W. Bush


Answer below...
Posted by Aaron on 08/30 at 07:31 PM in Weather
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Linking Myself

One of the things I like about blogging is the way you can quickly discover the story behind the story. I saw a story at Lucianne about a 10-year-old winning an art contest, read the story, and then checked out the website of the group holding the contest. It's quite stunning, even coming from our friends in the "reality-based community".
Posted by Brainster on 08/30 at 02:05 AM in Terrorism
(0) TrackbacksPermalinkEmailPrint

Monday, August 29, 2005

The Draft Iraqi Constitution

Personally, I think it's beautiful (at least the Preamble). It is not Western, but these people have such a pride and they understand they represent a seachange in that reason. Pray for these Iraqi patriots. God bless them.

UPDATE: shoot down to Article 14! Read it carefully and ask yourself if there was not another document they consulted! WOW! All I can say is WOW!

[I am not going to italicize the text to make it easier to read]

PREAMBLE

We the sons of Mesopotamia, land of the (messengers), prophets, resting place of the holy imams, the leaders of civilization and the creators of the alphabet, the cradle of arithmetic: on our land, the first law put in place by mankind was written; in our nation, the most noble era of justice in the politics of nations was laid down; on our soil, the followers of the prophet and the saints prayed, the philosophers and the scientists theorized and the writers and poets created.

Recognizing God's right upon us; obeying the call of our nation and our citizens; responding to the call of our religious and national leaders (and our national forces and politicians) and the insistence of our great religious authorities and our leaders and our reformers, we went by the millions for the first time in our history to the ballot box, men and women, young and old, on Jan. 30, 2005, remembering the pains of the despotic band's sectarian oppression; inspired by the suffering of Iraq's martyrs -- Sunni and Shiite, Arab, Kurd and Turkomen, and the remaining brethren in all communities -- inspired by the injustice against the holy cities (and the south) in the popular uprising and (burnt with the sorrows of the mass graves, the marches and Dujail and others); recalling the agonies of the national oppression in the massacres of Halabja, Barzan, Anfal and against the Faili Kurds; inspired by the tragedies of the Turkomen in Bashir, and as in other parts of Iraq, (the people of the western region have suffered from the liquidation of its leaders, symbols, tribal leaders and displacing its intellectuals, so we worked hand in hand and shoulder to shoulder) to create a new Iraq, Iraq of the future, without sectarianism, racial strife, regionalism, discrimination and (elimination).

Terrorism and "takfir" (Editors Note: takfir means to declare someone an infidel) did not divert us from moving forward to build a nation of law. Sectarianism and racism did not stop us from marching together to strengthen our national unity, set ways to peacefully transfer power, adopt a manner to fairly distribute wealth and give equal opportunity to all.

We the people of Iraq, newly arisen from our disasters and looking with confidence to the future through a democratic, federal, republican system, are determined -- men and women, old and young -- to respect the rule of law, reject the policy of aggression, pay attention to women and their rights, the elderly and their cares, the children and their affairs, spread the culture of diversity and defuse terrorism.

We are the people of Iraq, who in all our forms and groupings undertake to establish our union freely and by choice, to learn yesterday's lessons for tomorrow, and to write down this permanent constitution from the high values and ideals of the heavenly messages and the developments of science and human civilization, and to adhere to this constitution, which shall preserve for Iraq its free union of people, land and sovereignty.


Please click below for full text.