« But I Thought There Was No Terrorist Threat | Main | "Green Helmet" Exposed »
August 10, 2006
Where is the dust on this man?
More questionable photography from the NYTimes picked up by BizzyBlog and Gateway Pundit (and Brainster):

There is only dust on the man's feet (from probably walking to the rubble) and on his hands (which he probably used to get into the rubble). It also looks like he was greased up with baby oil for the photo...
Posted by Aaron at August 10, 2006 08:11 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.lifelikepundits.com/cgi-bin/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/2675
Comments
Ok, you'r right Aaron. Every single photograph used by anybody but FAUX and Newsmax is phoney. I'm sure you're right about the baby oil. If I was taking a photo of someone in a mediterranian country in August I'd want him to look like he was sweating, too. Oh, wait a minute...What if he really was sweating?
You've really got to get over this "They must be lying because they don't agree with Faux" neurosis.
Posted by: IaintBacchus at August 10, 2006 11:27 AM
Bacchus, are you insane? Do you really think that someone who was caught in a building collapse looks that clean? You get more dust on you putting up a hat rack! Get your head out of your posteriror!
Posted by: Charles at August 10, 2006 12:20 PM
"Every single photograph used by anybody but FAUX and Newsmax is phoney."
I'm sorry I missed the part of the post where he said this. Can you point me to it?
Posted by: PatrickP at August 10, 2006 06:12 PM
Probably was wearing a shirt when the building came down, but it could be facked, who cares? Look at all of the fake photo ops with the Prez smilling, those are fake as shit.
Posted by: paul at August 11, 2006 08:55 AM
Paul, don't be retarded.
Posted by: PatrickP at August 11, 2006 08:46 PM
Excuse me for pointing out the obvious here, but it my scientific backgroung don't you know:
The forgery accustion here is predicated mainly on the assumption that the victim here was burried in the rubble and not other manipulated.
How do the accusers know for instance that the victim in the photograph is not a rescue worker who was injured or became ill while going into the rubble to search for victims?
I once read a post made by a pundit namned AARON that said that these Muslims wash their bodies when they are about to die. Family members do the same for them. Maybe that is an explanation for the general cleanlieness of the victim?
Posted by: KeithS at August 12, 2006 09:01 AM
So they left his hands unwashed, Keith?
Did you see the entire series of pictures of this guy? Do you really thik he got the vapors or something?
Posted by: PatrickP at August 13, 2006 02:50 PM