« Rumsfeld Closes Arkansas | Main | Woman Gives the Finger...Literally! »
May 14, 2005
Military Base Closures
Get out the cheese, because here comes the whine.
The U.S. Defense Department has announced which military facilities that it wishes to close.
FOXNews reports, "Lawmakers' fight to keep their military bases is now on full throttle."
The federal lawmakers who are opposing the recommended base closings are doing so for the wrong reason.
There are situations in which a community or state needs to give up something for the benefit of the entire nation.
The closing of a military base is one such situation.
Federal lawmakers lack the courage to tell voters the truth about the U.S. military:
It is not the mission of the U.S. military to create and sustain civilian jobs.
Granted, nobody likes the loss of jobs, especially when hundreds of jobs are lost.
However, that's life.
The U.S. Constitution doesn't grant people the right to have jobs.
The U.S. Constitution doesn't grant cities the right to have military bases.
Sometimes life hands us a situation that forces us to either adapt or move.
For example, during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, many residents of the South-Central USA moved to the West Coast in order to survive.
During the oil bust of the 1980s, communities in Oklahoma learned how foolish it was to depend on one industry for economic survival. Those communities adapted by diversifying their industries.
During recent years, communities throughout the USA have had to endure layoffs at large corporations.
If a community is unable to endure the closing of a military base, then that community is nothing more than a welfare recipient.
Thus, the fight against the closing of a military base is a fight to keep people on government welfare. Keeping people dependent on government welfare is one way that some politicians guarantee their re-election.
Still, the threat of a job loss is troubling. Thankfully, the Bible addresses the deeper issue - personal survival.
In one of his sermons, Jesus said the following:
Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more important than food, and the body more important than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life?
And why do you worry about clothes? See how the lilies of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.
The closing of military bases results in a test of faith.
Are the people affected by the closures placing their faith in God, or are they placing their faith in the federal government?
Personal Note: Earlier this year, this pundit was forced to find a new employer when the job that he had was eliminated. Thus, this pundit is addressing an issue that he has dealt with personally.
Scripture taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved.
The "NIV" and "New International Version" trademarks are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office by International Bible Society. Use of either trademark requires the permission of International Bible Society.
Posted by Dodo David at May 14, 2005 03:57 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.lifelikepundits.com/cgi-bin/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/803
Comments
Very insightful article, David.
I also find it interesting that some of the politicians who are scrambling to keep these bases open are ones who are "against" military action by our forces unless it's in response to natural disasters. The war in Iraq was contested bitterly (after permission was given by the Senate), but now that civilian jobs are at stake, suddenly military bases are important.
Not to mention these are the folks who cry about how much money is going into our military. Why are they now turning around and saying that the bases should stay open? Because again, civilians would lose jobs. The soldiers themselves are just along for the ride.
My husband has been laid off from jobs not once, not twice, but THREE times in the past 15 years. Each time he has simply dusted off his resume and found work elsewhere. It's often been a struggle, but he doesn't expect the government to hand him anything...everything he has gotten he has earned by hard work and perseverance.
Posted by: Pam M. at May 14, 2005 07:59 PM
Uh, first of all, you speak of the constitution granting rights, which is not one of the functions of our constitution.
I'm happy for the base closings, but fear under Rumsfeld, the money won't be saved, but simply reshuffled back into unnecessary military spending, like missile defense.
Since no one else has the ability to close unnecessary bases, this should go ahead, but we should look closely at any new appropriations for defense that come in the near future. Base closings should go towards deficit reduction.
Posted by: paul at May 15, 2005 12:52 PM
bases should be opened and closed based on military threat to America and our allies--not to subsidies workers or to keep up local communities.
Posted by: Aaron Matthew Arnwine at May 16, 2005 11:53 AM
Oh, see, the best part of your article was in the "show more" section. Good stuff like this should "show some more leg" to the readers :-)
Posted by: Aaron Matthew Arnwine at May 16, 2005 11:54 AM
I haven't seen the list yet. Where are the major closures?
Posted by: IaintBacchus at May 16, 2005 05:54 PM